web_wikirubric

Research Report : wiki stub expansion

 * Mr. Schneider**


 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Quality of Information || Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. || Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. || Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. || Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. ||
 * Sources || All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. || All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format. || All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format. || Some sources are not accurately documented. ||
 * Mechanics || No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. || Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors || A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. || Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. ||
 * Internet Use || Successfully uses suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. || Usually able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. || Occasionally able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within these sites easily without assistance. || Needs assistance or supervision to use suggested internet links and/or to navigate within these sites. ||
 * Blog Entry || Blog entry clearly relates to topic and demonstrates in depth analysis of project. || Blog entry clearly relates to topic and occassionaly demonstrates in depth analysis of project. || Blog entry shows only a cursory reflection of the process. || Blog entry is poor or not present. ||